Remote spatial telepresence


Details:

The definitions under this heading explicitly involve technology; the phenomenon is a subjective property of an individual person; the source of the stimuli in the experience is only external (outside the body); and there is an inaccurate perceptioon that technology is not involved in the experience when it is; and the aspect of the phenonenon that is of primary interest is related to the physical environment, specifically the feeling, sense, or state of "being there" in a remote but real environment (and not one that is only a computer generated virtual one).

Sample defintion(s):

Minsky (1980):
"Each motion of your arm, hand, and fingers is reproduced at another place by mobile, mechanical hands. Light, dextrous and strong, these hands have their own sensors through which you see and feel what is happening. Using this instrument, you can 'work' in another room, in another city, in another country, or on another planet." (p. 45) "Telepresence emphasizes the importance of high-quality sensory feedback and suggests future instruments that will feel and work so much like our own hands that we won't notice any significant difference." (p. 47) "The biggest challenge to developing telepresence is achieving that sense of 'being there.' "

Saari et al. (2004):
"[T]elepresence, in turn, means that he/she feels present in a remote but real environment."

Sheridan (1992):
"[S]ense of being physically present with virtual object(s) at the remote teleoperator site” (p. 120)

Schloerb (1995):
"[A]n operator is objectively present if and only if it can successfully complete a specified task [in a remote environment]" (p. 68)